urbanglasgow.co.uk
For lovers of Urban Exploration of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Fight for £14m housing cash

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    urbanglasgow.co.uk Forum Index -> Glasgow development or demolition
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
james73
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 2313
Location: Utopia Planitia

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:36 am    Post subject: Fight for £14m housing cash Reply with quote

Fight for £14m housing cash (Evening Times)



A ROW has broken out over the future of housing in Easterhouse, with
community housing providers claiming they have been abandoned.


Neighbouring Wellhouse and Blairtummock Housing Associations say they
cannot get cash to build low-cost family houses on derelict sites.

They say socially rented homes are vital to rehouse tenants living in "horrendous"
properties, prevent gang fighting and complete two decades of regeneration
in an infamous area of deprivation.

Both have strong track records of regenerating their areas and are seen
as models of community ownership.

The associations say they are willing and able to build up to 250 houses in
Wellhouse and Rogerfield - all they need now is the cash, around £14million.

Both have been knocked back for funding by the council and GHA, which
own dilapidated properties that would be knocked down to make way for
the new homes.

But both the council and GHA point out they are spending tens of millions
building new homes in other parts of Easterhouse.

In a document obtained by the Evening Times, council regeneration chiefs
suggest Easterhouse has had its fair share of help and no more socially
rented housing will be needed in the foreseeable future.

It also suggests other projects - including the Commonwealth Games
Village and the M74 extension - are more deserving, and private housebuilders
should step in to bridge gaps.

But that has given little hope to angry residents who now plan to protest
at the city chambers.



James H
_________________
Happiness ain't at the end of the road - Happiness *IS* the road...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
big drew
Buttered roll
Buttered roll


Joined: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 9
Location: priesthill, glasgow

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you almost got it....
Both the Council and the GHA (basically the Council in another guise), have plans of their own, and will.....if possible....sell off the green space ( again), so that a private quango can step in, with proposals for a 'custom build', in exchange for permission to build overly expensive bungalows.
Becoming a bit obvious as a 'Glasgow Factor'.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    urbanglasgow.co.uk Forum Index -> Glasgow development or demolition All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group and a bunch of camp hockey players...
Copyright © 2007-2009 urbanglasgow.co.uk
Walk on the wild side